-
Human Rights Commission Consultation
Not sure if this is the right place to post this – maybe we could have a folder on legal issues and information.
In any case, the Australian Human Rights Commission has announced that they are conducting a consultation regarding protection from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and sex and/or gender identity. This consultation will consider the possible inclusion of protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and sex and/or gender identity in federal anti-discrimination law.
The Commission is inviting people to make comments, which can be submitted either by email or online. Closing dates for comments is Friday 26 November.
The Commission is also holding a series of roundtables as part of this consultation. The Roundtables focusing on discrimination on the basis of sex or gender identity will be held:
In Sydney on 28 October between 6-8.30pm (Venue: Australian Human Rights Commission, Level 8, 133 Castlereagh Street, Sydney)
In Melbourne – 9 November, 6-8.30 pm (Venue: Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, Level 3, 380 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne).
Further details can be found on the Commission’s website:
http://www.hreoc.gov.au/human_rights/lgbti/lgbticonsult/index.htmlOften the strengths of these consultations is in the personal stories of discrimination and prejudice that are received from individuals who have been subject to these human rights breaches. While it can be difficult and intimidating to relive these experiences by submitting them to consultations such as these, this can be a process which enables us to participate in securing protections which may help in preventing such discrimination and prejudice in the future.
If girls have experienced discrimination in employment, in accessing services, in accommodation, or in other situations, this is an opportunity to tell Australia’s national human rights body. The Commission has called for federal protection from discrimination on these grounds for many years. The more evidence it has to argue for such protections, the stronger the case for securing the necessary change in legislation.